Daily News Digest

by Mark Zalewski

June 15, 2016

In today’s CT Daily News Digest: Richeze wins tight Suisse sprint; Judge rules that Operacion Puerto blood bags can finally be handed over; UCI, WADA to push for identification of Puerto athletes; Interview: Why Phil Gaimon believes Danielson wasn’t doping; Keagan Girdlestone out of coma and breathing unassisted; Dot watching – The Trans Am and the Tour Divide; Rio velodrome not ready until mid-July; UK Anti-Doping admits failures in Dan Stevens case; Copeland to manage new Bahrain team; Fabio Felline set to return to racing; Chris Anker Sørensen speaks of Tinkoff team exit; Cycling media loses valued member; Leah Kirchman extends with Liv-Plantur; Is cycling more harmful to the environment than a car?; Aviva Women’s Tour Of Britain Preview; Brandon Semenuk pins it for 100 seconds; Danny Van Poppel makes incredible save, is fined by commissaires 

Is cycling more harmful to the environment than a car?

by CyclingTips

A graduate researcher at Harvard contends that a cyclist on a Paleo diet produces more environmental harm than a hybrid vehicle. The main factor in the calculations are the CO2 emissions associated with livestock production.

UCI disc brake bungle-feature

Daniel Thorpe of Harvard University’s Keith Group studied the effects using a measure called carbon dioxide equivalents (CO2e) which allows for a comparable measure of different kinds of gases based on their “Global Warming Potential” (GWP).

Thorpe acknowledges there are qualifications to the study, such as someone with a normal diet or even a vegan diet having much less impact. But a takeaway from the study is that a lot more goes into warming the planet than simply direct emissions from vehicles.

“Agricultural impacts on the environment really matter,” he said. “Biking has a surprisingly similar impact to driving on a per kilometre basis, and depending on your diet can cause noticeably more emissions and land use.”

“There are reasons to think we should care more about short-term warming, since we’ll have an easier time adapting to slower changes farther in the future, but it seems odd to completely neglect everything more than 100 years away.”

Click through to read more at Road.cc.

BACK TO TOP